Watch: Day 4 of public Trump impeachment hearings (FULL LIVE STREAM)

Watch: Day 4 of public Trump impeachment hearings (FULL LIVE STREAM)

55 Replies to “Watch: Day 4 of public Trump impeachment hearings (FULL LIVE STREAM)”

  1. After hearing the past 2 days of testimonies, I predict that trump will resign. Either resign, or be force-ably removed from office in disgrace! I will vote straight democrat because of what the republicons been doing!

  2. Lol jfc this Nunes is pathetic. I'm genuinely embarrassed for him or anyone who actually takes his speeches seriously.

    He's flat out lying in his opening statements.

  3. Oh yeah.

  4. Everyone has something that they've done in their life that they regret and the president is no exception so sure you can dig up something on him but if he's impeached and put out of office there's no one to replace him to do the things that he's done that he said he would do and has been accomplishing, I think America is in for a bleak future if he gets removed from office

  5. How bout asking Pete about falsely claiming leadng blacks support his "Douglas" proposal when they didn;t and when 1/2 were caucasion.

  6. Republicans keep harping on the question: Do you think there is a [potential-appearance] of conflict of interest? Congressman Elise Stefanik of N.Y. said, when asked-every witness testimony has agreed that there is a potential appearance…Heck, even I agree there was a POTENTIAL-APPEARANCE of of conflict of interest. But why do so many people understand this to be an "I Gotch ya" moment? I know there a several three syllable words in that question, so I wouldn't expect republicans to comprehend the question. Potential-has no DEFINITIVE meaning in this question. Appearance-is a SUBJECTIVE word. An analogy could be: You see a woman wearing a very short skirt, revealing tight-busted blouse, fishnet hosiery and thigh high boots…Does she have the POTENTIAL-APPEARANCE of being a prostitute. The answer is of coarse yes-people may potentially believe that to be true. Does she have the appearance of being a prostitute? According to what [society] has ingrained in our minds-most likely, she would APPEAR to be as such. And this is purely a SUBJECTIVE perception. Evangelicals of the red-states would immediately label her a JEZEBEL. But is this woman indeed a JEZEBEL or simply have bad taste in clothing?

    So indeed, there is a potential-appearance of Hunter Biden's high-paying Ukraine job to be a conflict of interest. But a accepting a high-paying job in not indicative of corruption.

  7. Why in the universe the Dems are found entitled to investigate a sitting president round the clock and let him down internationally and send the former secretary of state to meet with enemies of America but no one can investigate the former VP? If the former VP was a good and clean guy, why is it that the Dems are so afraid of him being investigated? Why, because he is above the LAW????

  8. Direct from the mouth of Gordon Sondland at today’s testimony in response to questioning from Schiff: “I believe I just asked him (the President) an open-ended question Mr. Chairman. ‘What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that… what do you want?’ And it was a very short, abrupt conversation, he was not in a good mood, and he just said, ‘I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelinsky to do the right thing.’ “

  9. The head ofUkrainian MP Andriy Derkach claimed that the family of ex-President Yanukovich funneled $7.4 billion through American investment firm Franklin Templeton Investments, which they tied to the U.S. Democratic Party. Burisma Holdings has been indicted and Ukrainian officials want President Trump to join them investigating the Bidens and other Americans for their role in laundering billions.

  10. “Chalupa! I say….Chalupa, Dear Sir! The DNC worked with Chalupa to take Trump down with Mexican food! We all know they were out to get him! We know he can’t refuse Mexican food!”

  11. Democrats EXPOSED themselves and now it backfires them. They exposed themselves as defender of corruption. If they are serious about corruption, why they don't allow Hunter Biden to present himself before impeachment as he was BOARD MEMBER OF WELL-KNOWN CORRUPT COMPANY. They shift the goal post from quadproco to bribery…. Democrats defending quodproco, corruption and bribery of Joe Biden in the name of impeachment

    If they are serious about quodproco, corruption and bribery they must first investigate Joe Biden and Haliary Clinton. Because charity begins at home

  12. This constant obsession with Trump's personality is a joke. Every time the Democrats embellish a fake charge, we hear about Trump's personality and how it contributes to the problem.  Enough. This impeachment is bogus. The Russia collusion story was rubbish. The real story is that even with the constant attacks Trump has done and is doing a great job. If you don't like his tweets don't read them. I don't. They are hardly newsworthy. What is newsworthy is the threat to the constitutional order caused by Democrat obsession with Trump. Trump's personality is not responsible for the reprehensible conduct of many in Washington to undermine him.  They are doing from their own mean spirited hatred of Trump and the people who elected him.

  13. Only the dimwitted will listen to Adam "Shifty" Schiff and believe that the witness Sondland actually said their was a military assistance quid-pro-quo. The further impaired will believe that the President acting upon a quid-pro-quo for the good of the country is illegal. Common Core "education" has destroyed this America.

  14. December 9th the report will come in all your witnesses will be exposed it's coming clown this isn't the only investigation going on ha ha ha

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *